LDD Today


[back to "Notes from Support: Conversion Services of the SMTP MTA"]

Notes-to-Internet message mapping table (sidebar)
Shown below is the table I created during this exercise. Keep in mind, however, the values and field labels reflect my test environment. Your results may vary:

Note: Blank fields indicate no value and NA indicates the value is not applicable to the format.
Value
Notes Field Label
RFC 822 Field Label
0
$KeepPrivateNA
06/10/98 06:45:22 AM$RevisionsNA
CN=Bret Swedeen/O=Lotus$UpdatedByNA
bob.jones@ibm.comBlindCopyToBCC (Header Information)
Hello WorldBodyBody (which is contained in the WQBody0 attachment)
jsmith@iris.comCopyToCC (Header Information)
1DefaultMailSaveOptionsNA
0EncryptNA
MemoFormNA
CN=Bret Swedeen/O=LotusFromFrom (Header Information)
0LogoNA
0MailOptionsNA
1MailSaveOptionsNA
06/10/98 06:45:21 AMPostedDateDate (Header Information)
CN=Bret Swedeen/O=LotusPrincipal0
john_doe@lotus.com jsmith@iris.com bob.jones@ibm.comRecipientsDepends on which message you examine.
1SaveOptionsNA
0SECUREMAILNA
0SenderTagNA
john_doe@lotus.comSendToTo (Header Information)
0SignNA
Exercise 3SubjectSubject (Header Information)
My test message included a BCC recipient, which caused the conversion task to create another instance of the message just for the BCC recipient. In that message, the BCC recipient appears. In the other message, however, the BCC field is blank. If I had added another BCC recipient, the conversion task would have created another instance of the message for that other BCC recipient.